Abstract:
The study investigates the written performance of the
Sudanese EFL students. The study aims to assess the
written texts produced by the students in order to find out
how successful they are in their use of writing as a
mechanism through which meaning is communicated.
To achieve the aim of the study, the researcher
employs the analytic descriptive method. The subjects of
the study consist of 65 Sudanese EFL teachers drawn from
some Sudanese universities and 240 fourth level students
who are taking English as their major in five Sudanese
universities. Three tools were used for data collection:
writing test, two questionnaires (one for the teachers and
the other for the students) and an interview with the
students.
By using the statistical program SPSS, the study has
revealed that Sudanese EFL students do not possess the
ability to cope with the different modes of writing. This
makes them unable to develop an understanding of how
to employ the linguistic, cultural and social knowledge to
develop an idea into a meaningful and comprehensive
written text. The study has also shown that students are
not able to depend on the strategies of writing so that
they can produce texts which stimulate readers and keep
their attention. Furthermore, the study has revealed that
the students are not prepared to benefit from their
v
teachers and peers while they are writing; they never ask
for advice or any clarification but do their writing
individually.
Moreover,
the
study
has
reached
the
conclusion that the students’ inability to know what the
readers know and what they want is one of the factors
that lead students to produce less informative written
texts.
The
study
has
concluded
that
the
poor
communicative competence the students possess stems
from different factors: (1) the instruction the students
receive in writing does not revolve around the issues that
enable them to develop their abilities as writers, (2) the
students are not motivated enough to exert efforts and
seek opportunities to engage into deliberate writing and
intensive reading so that they can promote their writing
abilities, (3) the environment in which writing is done do
not enhance and foster students' ability to create writing
which is sophisticated and communicative in nature, (4)
teachers also do not encourage these students to view
writing as a mechanism through which meaning is
negotiated, and (5) the sorts of feedback these students
receive
on
their
writing
do
not
contribute
to
the
development of students' writing proficiency. To help the
students develop their writing skills, teachers should help
the students be knowledgeable about the different modes
of writing and be knowledgeable about the lexical and
grammatical structures required by each mode. Teachers
also need to help the students develop the linguistic skills
vi
they need in the process of writing so that they can