SUST Repository

Comparative study of Petrophysical Properties in Bentiu & Aradeiba Formations & Their implication to Reservoir Quality

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ahmed, Abuobaida Musa
dc.contributor.author Abdalgader, Ahmed Mohammed
dc.contributor.author Fadl Elseed, Akram Mojahed
dc.contributor.author Supervisor, - T. Amro Yousof
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-24T10:49:49Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-24T10:49:49Z
dc.date.issued 2022-02-01
dc.identifier.citation Ahmed, Abuobaida Musa.Comparative study of Petrophysical Properties in Bentiu & Aradeiba Formations & Their implication to Reservoir Quality\Abuobaida Musa Ahmed....{etal};T. Amro Yousof.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science & Technology,College of Petroleum Engineering & Technology,2022.-48p.:ill.;28cm.-Bachelors Search. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/27414
dc.description Thesis en_US
dc.description.abstract In this study wire line logging data of exploration well Laloba AG-1 in Muglad basin were analyzed in order to discriminates between the petro-physical properties in Aradeiba & Bentiu formations and accordingly to identify the formation of better reservoir quality. The petro-physical properties used were: shale volume (Vsh), total & effective porosities (PhiT & PhiE) as well as water saturation (Sw). Aradeiba formation was found to be more enriched in shale as compared to Bentiu which is cleaner. The Vsh in Aradeiba range between (0.17) to (0.9) with average value of (0.65), while Bentiu has Vsh range between (0) to (1) with average value of (0.44). The net to gross ratio was found to be (0.63) to (0.74) in Aradeiba, while in Bentiu (0.67) to (0.46) net to gross range was observed. The average effective porosity in Aradeiba formation was (0.23), while in Bentiu it was found to be (0. 22). The average water saturation in Aradeiba was found to be (0.8), while for Bentiu it averages about (0.89). The pay reservoir thickness in Aradeiba at zone one (1.83) and zone two (4.42) and in Bentiu at zone three (13.11), zone four (5.05) and zone five (4.42). Accordingly, Bentiu formation was found to be of better reservoir quality and more prolific compared to Aradeiba. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Sudan University of Science & Technology en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sudan University of Science & Technology en_US
dc.subject Petrophysical Properties en_US
dc.subject Reservoir Quality en_US
dc.title Comparative study of Petrophysical Properties in Bentiu & Aradeiba Formations & Their implication to Reservoir Quality en_US
dc.title.alternative دراسة للمقارنة الخصائص البتروفيزيائية في تكوين بانتو و عرديبة وتأثيرها علي جودة المكمن en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search SUST


Browse

My Account