SUST Repository

Evaluation of Environmental impact on Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella species isolated from poultry farms

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mohammed, Rawda Yousif Ahmed
dc.contributor.author Supervisor, - Galal Eldin ElAzhari Mohammed
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-22T07:30:04Z
dc.date.available 2017-03-22T07:30:04Z
dc.date.issued 2017-02-07
dc.identifier.citation Mohammed, Rawda Yousif Ahmed .Evaluation of Environmental impact on Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella species isolated from poultry farms /Rawda Yousif Ahmed Mohammed; Galal Eldin ElAzhari Mohammed.-khartoum:Sudan University of Science And Technology,College of Animal Production,2017.-142p:ill.;28cm.-Ph.D. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/15845
dc.description Thesis en_US
dc.description.abstract This study is targeted the prevalence of Salmonella species in Khartoum State chicken broiler farms environment, and to detect the resistance pattern to different antibiotics by using phenotyping method and detecting beta lactams resistant genes. Four hundred and sixty five samples were collected randomly from 44 farms in Khartoum, Omdurman, and Bahry Localities, they included water source, drinkers, feed source, feeders, faeces, Litter, Cloacal swabs, hand swabs from workers, dust swabs, carcass swabs, carcass meat, and Knife swabs. The samples were analyzed by using ISO 6579: (2002), then confirmed by using API 20E strips. Twenty nine Salmonella species (6.2%) were identified as 21(72.4%) Salmonella arizonae and 8 (27.6%) Salmonella choleraesuis collected from 21 farms in Khartoum State. The isolates were from water source 1 (3.4%), drinkers 4 (13.8%), feeders 4 (13.8%), faeces 3 (10.3%), litter 10 (34.5%), cloacal swabs 1 (3.4%), hand swabs from workers 1 (3.4%), dust swabs 4 (13.8%), and Knife swabs 1 (3.4%). There was no Salmonellae isolated from feed source, carcass swab, and carcass meat. Isolates showed high resistance to amoxicillin 26 (89.7%), followed by tetracycline 16 (55.2%), nalidixic acid14 (48.3%), ampicillin 13 (44.8%), co-trimoxazole 10 (34.5%), streptomycin 8 (27.6%), colisitin and chloramphenicol 3 (10.3%), and gentamicin 2 (6.9%), however, all isolates showed high sensitivity to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, cefixime, cefalexin, and ceftriaxone. Salmonella arizonae showed multidrug resistance to nine antibiotics, amoxicillin 19 (90.5%), tetracycline 12(57.1%), nalidixic acid 11(52.4%), ampicillin10 (47.6%), co trimoxazole 6 (28.6%), streptomycin 5 (23.8%), chloramphenicol and colistin 3(14.3%), and gentamycin 2(9.5%), however all isolates showed high sensitivity to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, cefixime, cefalexin, and ceftriaxone en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Sudan University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sudan University of Science And Technology en_US
dc.subject Evaluation of Environmental impact en_US
dc.title Evaluation of Environmental impact on Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella species isolated from poultry farms en_US
dc.title.alternative تقییم الأثر البیئي علي مقاومة مضادات المیكروبات لأنواع بكتیریا السالمونیلا المعزولة من مزارع الدواجن بولایة الخرطوم. en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.contributor.Co-Supervisor Supervisor,-Mohammed Abdalsalam Abdall


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search SUST


Browse

My Account