اعتراضات الامام العلوى على اراء ابن الاثير البلاغية فى كتابيهما (الطراز والمثل السائر)

Abstract

This research is entiteled: “Disagreements of Imam Al alawi on Ibn Al-Atheer’s rehtoric opinions in the two books of (“Al-Mathal Assair Fi Adab AlKatib wal Shair” by Ibn Al-Atheer and “Al-Tiraaz” by Imam Al-Alawi). Where Al- Imam Al-Alawi reject many of Ibn Al-Atheers rehetoric opinions. The research aimed at the following. Firstly. Mentioning of the controversied issues between Ibn Al- Atheer and Al-Alawi to reach to either preference or docuementation. Secondly: Caring for the books of Arabic heritage; no doubt that the book of (Al-mathal Assair) and (Attriraz) are cansidered among the classic books of Arabic reheoric. Thirdly: Knowing the life history of Ibn Al-Atheer and Al-Alawi as tow im- portant figures of Arabic rehetorec. Fourthly: Accepting or regecting the claims of Ibn Al-Al Atheer throush re- search experiment. The research followied the discriptive, analytic and compara- tive methodlogy. Accordig by the reseacher reached to those results+ One: Ibn al A-Atheer wsas knowledgable and a writen of many books despite his being occupied by politics which means theat he who excelling in all fiedls. Two: Ibn Al-Atheer revised some of his previous opinions concering some rehertoric concepts such as (Iltifa = changing in seech one pronoun by an other) anddifferentiation between itnab (Prolonged speech) and tatweel (prolonged dis- course). Three: Ibn Al-Atheer was prior to Al-Alawi and Al-Alawi made use of Ibn Al- Atheer in many of his opinions and that Al-Alawi was moderate in his criticsm. Four: Imam Al-Alawi would not contradict except when he explained the lim- its and convinced his opponant. Five: His contradictions were confined to Bayan and Maani (rehtoric and Se- mantics) sciences and not in the Badi science. These are the researchers re commendations: firstly: Studying the objections Ibn Abi Al-Hadead against (Al-Mathal Al Sair). Secondly: Prepration of a research about Imam Al-Alawi as a religions scholar because he write book in the fields of origin of religion, distribution of in heritence, propletic life, jurisprudence, faith and sufism. Thirdly: Preperation of a research about Ibn Al-Atheer as a politician and a minister, i.e the second side of his life because historians were not fair to him as the re searcher believes.