Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/6065
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBashier, Abdelfattah Bashier Ahmed-
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor,- Hamid Suliman Abdalla-
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-26T11:53:39Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-26T11:53:39Z-
dc.date.issued2013-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationBashier,Abdelfattah Bashier Ahmed.Comparison of Various Techniques in Diagnosis of Malaria/Abdelfattah Bashier Ahmed Bashier;Hamid Suliman Abdalla.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science & Technology,Medical Laboratory Science,2013.-39p. : ill. ; 28cm.-M.Sc.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/6065-
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstracthis study was conducted in aperiod from march to October (2013) in Abri city which is located in Northern State. The aim of the study was to compair blood film smears with ICTAg , ICT-Ab and buffy coat technique.. The study was conducted on 200 blood samples . Of them, 118 (59 %) samples were found to be positive for malaria parasites by blood smear , 128 (64%) were positive by the ICT- Antigen detection test. While the positivity of the ICT- Antibody detection test and buffy coat smears were 131 (67%) and 121 (60.5%) respectively. In this study the sensitivity and specificity of ICT-Ag , ICT-Ab and buffy coat smears were calculated. We used the BF as gold standard to compare our results. ICT-Ag had a sensitivity and specificity of 99.15% and 88.17% respectively, while ICT-Ab showed sensitivity of 96.61, specificity 96% and buffy coat smears had sensitivity of 95.76% , specificity of 91.11% for detection of malaria. The results also showed that the sensitivity of ICT-Ag , ICT-Ab and buffy coat smear in low malaria infections (1-10 parasites\100fields) is 98.07%, 94.23%, 90.38% respectively ,while their sensitivity in high infections was 100% ,83.33% ,100% respectively.However their sensitivity was 100% in moderate infections for all techniques.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science & Technologyen_US
dc.subjectVarious Techniques-Comparisonen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosis-Malaria-Various Techniquesen_US
dc.titleComparison of Various Techniques in Diagnosis of Malariaen_US
dc.title.alternativeمقارنة بین اسالیب التقنیة المختلفة فى تشخیص الملاریاen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Masters Dissertations : Medical Laboratory Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison of Various ... .pdfTitle136.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Abstract.pdfAbstract256.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Research.pdf
  Restricted Access
Research1.95 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.