Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/3148
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Suleiman Mohieldin Omar
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor,- Abedelhafiz Hassan Khattab
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-16T07:23:18Z
dc.date.available2014-01-16T07:23:18Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.identifier.citationIbrahim,Suleiman Mohieldin Omar.Efficacy of Haemodialysis in Sudanese Patients With Chronic Renal Failure Using Measurement of Serum Urea/Suleiman Mohieldin Omar Ibrahim;Abedelhafiz Hassan Khattab.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science and Technology,college of Medical Laboratory Science,2009.-41p. : ill. ; 28cm.-M.Sc.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/3148
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstractAn ever-increasing number of patients have to undergo regular renal dialysis to compensate for acute or chronic renal failure. The adequacy of the dialysis treatment has a profound effect on patients’ morbidity and mortality. Therefore it is necessary to assess the delivered dialysis dose. For the quantification of the dialysis dose two parameters are most commonly used, namely the normalized dose of dialysis (Kt/V value) and the urea reduction rate (URR), yet the prescribed dialysis dose often differs from the actual delivered dialysis dose. This is an analytical, cross-sectional, and hospital-based study conducted on fifty patients with chronic renal failure under haemodialysis treatment at Khartoum (Dr.Selma) Center of Haemodialysis and Renal Transplantation and at Mawadah Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan, during the period from Nov to Mar 2009. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of haemodialysis and to compare the two different protocols i.e. two session of dialysis per week (group A) and three session of dialysis per week (group B) in terms of efficacy (KT/V) and urea reduction rate (URR). Pre- and postdialysis serum urea and creatinine were measured in each patient. Results: Mean efficacy (KT/V) of group A (1.15 ± 0.33) and group B (1.31 ± 0.27), (P = 0.10). And mean urea reduction rate (URR) of group A (66.8 ± 10.4) and group B (72.2 ± 7.3), (P = 0.07). Mean pre- dialysis blood urea of group A (160.5 ± 43.6) and group B (141 ± 0.25.7), (P = 0.13).Mean postdialysis blood urea of group A (53.4 ± 21.9) and group B (39.2 ± 11.7), (P = 0.005). Pre-dialysis serum creatinine of group A (9.5 ± 2.7) and group B (9.3 ± 0.1.7), (P = 0.81). Mean postdialysis serum creatinine of group A (3.8 ± 1.6) and group B (3.6 ± 1.0), (P = 0.72). Conclusion: This study finds that the efficacy of haemodialysis, in Sudanese patients with chronic renal failure, meets the minimum international standards. Also the efficacy of haemodialysis (kt/v) and urea reduction rate (URR) were better (but statistically insignificant) with three sessions per week protocol.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSUDAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.subjectHaemodialysisen_US
dc.subjectRenal Failureen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of Haemodialysis in Sudanese Patients With Chronic Renal Failure Using Measurement of Serum Ureaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Masters Dissertations : Medical Laboratory Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Efficacy of Haemodialysis....pdfTitle45.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Abstract.pdfAbstract102.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Research.pdf
  Restricted Access
Research363.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
Questionnaire.pdfQuestionnaire39.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.