Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/12611
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Amel Bushra Abakar-
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor, -Alsafee Ahmed Abdullah Bula-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-28T06:49:37Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-28T06:49:37Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationAhmed,Amel Bushra Abakar.Evaluation of Renal Scarring by Using Ultrasound and Renal Scintigraphy/Amel Bushra Abakar Ahmed;Alsafee Ahmed Abdullah Bula.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science and Technology,college of medical radiologic science,2015.-71p:ill;28cm.-M.Sc.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/12611-
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of this study was to compare the value of renal ultrasonography and cortical scintigraphy with technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) in detecting renal cortical scars in urinary tract infection (UTI) patients . Renal Scintigraphy (Tc99m - DMSA scan) and Ultrasonography studies were done in 60 children who were referred to the nuclear medicine department in Fujairah hospital between Jun 2014 and May 2015 because of documented urinary tract infection (UTI). Outcomes of both modalities were compared, with focus on renal scarring. Renal scarring detection rates of Tc-DMSA scan and Ultrasonography were compared. In total, 60 patients underwent both renal scintigraphy and ultrasonography; more scars were seen on DMSA scintigraphy than on ultrasonography: 55% versus 15% of patients. The ultrasonography was difficult to interpret, which mean many more scars were missed on ultrasonography compared with easily interpretable DMSA scintigraphy images. In children with urinary tract infection (UTI), ultrasonography compared with DMSA scintigraphy, renal scars are often missed, especially when the ultrasound is difficult to interpret.  In this study, Tc-DMSA scan detected scars in 30% of kidneys reported to be normal on ultrasound. Ultrasonography was found to be an inappropriate study in the detection of renal parenchymal scars.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.subjectmedical Radiologic scienceen_US
dc.subjectEvaluation of Renal Scarringen_US
dc.subjectUltrasounden_US
dc.subjectRenal Scintigraphyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Renal Scarring by Using Ultrasound and Renal Scintigraphyen_US
dc.title.alternativeتقويم التصلب الكلوي باستخدام الموجات فوق الصوتية وفحص الطب النوويen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Masters Dissertations : Medical Radiologic Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evaluation of Renal .....pdfTitle26.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
ABSTRACT.pdfAbstract64.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Research.pdfResearch1.9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.