dc.contributor.author |
Mohammed, Omer Beraima Idam |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Supervisor- Adil Abdalla Hago |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-11-19T11:02:08Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-11-19T11:02:08Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2007-01-01 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Mohammed,Omer Beraima Idam .DIAGNOSIS OF UROLITHAISIS BY ULTRASOUND AND CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY COMPARATIVE STUDY/Omer Beraima Idam Mohammed;Adil Abdalla Hago . -Khartoum : Sudan University of Science And Technology, College of Medical Radiology , 2007.-50 p:Ill;28 cm.- M.S.c |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/8137 |
|
dc.description |
Thesis |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
This study was carried out in Soba University Hospital
which supplied with modern high quality machines together with
enough patients for the study.
A total of 50 patients were subjected to the U/S and
conventional x-ray investigations. Those patients were referred
from the urology clinic after the initial clinical investigation which
suggested the presence of UT stones.
As suspected, the U/S investigation was carried out
smoothly in short time, but the conventionally x-ray
investigations were followed with more problems, such as the
preparation of patients, the contrast media reaction and the time
consuming in addition to radiation exposure.
The results of these investigations were coincidenced with
the questionnaire answers and with that in the most references in
most patients. For quick understanding the results were put in
tables with percentage and followed by statistical graphs and
then the comparison between the U/S results and x-ray results
took place.
From this comparison it is clear that the U/S investigation
is the best and main modality for the detection of urolithasis. The
U/S detected urolithaisis in 90% of the examined cases, where
the x-ray investigations detected urolithaisis in only 68% of them.
Because of the importance of early detection of urolithaisis, the
researcher recommended that a more researches should take
place for them using the modern radiological modalities such as
spiral CT and MRI. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
SUST |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Sudan University of Science and Technology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
ANUROLITHAISIS |
en_US |
dc.subject |
CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY |
en_US |
dc.subject |
DIAGNOSIS |
en_US |
dc.subject |
ULTRASOUND |
en_US |
dc.title |
DIAGNOSIS OF UROLITHAISIS BY ULTRASOUND AND CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY COMPARATIVE STUDY |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
تشخيص حصاوي الجهاز البو لى بالمو جات فو ق الصو تية و الاشعة التشخيصية دراسة مقار نة( |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |