SUST Repository

Effects of Preparation methods and storage period on chemical composition, nutritive value and quality of dried beef meat

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ali, Halima Ahmed Saeed
dc.date.accessioned 2014-08-13T08:22:48Z
dc.date.available 2014-08-13T08:22:48Z
dc.date.issued 2013-03-13
dc.identifier.citation Ali,Halima Ahmed Saeed .Effects of Preparation methods and storage period on chemical composition, nutritive value and quality of dried beef meat/Halima Ahmed Saeed Ali;Daoud Alzubair Ahmed.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science and Technology,College of Animal Production Science and Technology,2013.-75p :ill ;28cm.-M.Sc. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/6625
dc.description Thesis en_US
dc.description.abstract Effects of preparation methods and storage period on chemical composition, nutritive value and quality of dried beef meat were investigated. Three different methods were applied: Preparation by oven, air under shade and drying in the sun light. Samples from each preparation method were taken for analysis for three successive months. The dry matter, crude protein, ether extract and ash content of the samples showed significant difference (P<0.01). Dry matter, crude protein and ash content were highest in samples dried by the sun (94. 61±0.06, 78.08±1.56 and 6.77±0.49% respectively), whereas ether extract percentage was highest in samples dried by oven (16.57±0.06%). The results of nutritive value (energy, crude protein and ash) of the dried beef meat showed that, there was high significant differences (P<0.01) in all parameters measured. Samples prepared by oven had higher energy value (485.52 ±2.16), whereas samples prepared by air had lower value (393.38±2.43) compared to the other preparation methods. Colour, texture, smell and overall acceptability of the samples showed significant difference (P<0.01). Samples prepared by air and drying under the sun recorded higher values in colour (6.1±1.10, 6.80±0.63%); texture (6.20±0.79, 6.22±1.01%); smell (6.10±1.10, 6.80±0.63%) and overall acceptability (6.50±0.97, 6.90±0.88%) respectively. Whereas, samples prepared by oven had lowest value in quality attributes (4.60±1.26; 4.00±0.94; 3.00±1.04 and 4.00±1.25%) for colour; texture; smell and overall acceptability respectively. Microbial assessment result showed the mean values of total bacterial count, coliform, E.coli, Salmonella and fungi of dried beef meat by different preparation methods and storage periods. Samples prepared by drying under the sun had higher total bacterial count (7.00±0.17CFU/g-1); samples prepared by air had positive results for E.coli, whereas all samples were free from Salmonella and fungi. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Sudan University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sudan University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.subject value and quality en_US
dc.subject Preparation methods en_US
dc.title Effects of Preparation methods and storage period on chemical composition, nutritive value and quality of dried beef meat en_US
dc.title.alternative تأثير طرق التجفيف وفترة التخزين على الخواص الكيميائية، القيمة الغذائية وجودة لحوم الأبقار المجففة en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search SUST


Browse

My Account