Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/4866
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorElhassan, Marwa Abd Alla Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor ,- Alnazier Osman Moh
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-08T11:19:34Z
dc.date.available2014-05-08T11:19:34Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-01
dc.identifier.citationElhassan,Marwa Abd Alla Mohammed .Evaluation of conventional X-ray unit in medical imaging department/Marwa Abd Alla Mohammed Elhassan;Alnazier Osman Moh. Hamza.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science and Technology,College of Engineering,2012.-61p. : ill. ; 28cm.-M.Sc.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/4866
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstractConventional radiography or X-ray is part of diagnostic imaging tool for detection and diagnosis of diseases. Since the X-ray was discovered in 1895 to 2010 more than 5 billion medical imaging studies were published worldwide. However, there are certain harmful biological effects were recorded; for that the concept of quality control and radiation protection was developed to minimize these effects. But now in most of developing countries there is lack of awareness and interest of radiation protection and quality control in radiology department even sometimes there is no QC tools, which can lead to improper dose, risk to the machine, error in reading and image quality. The present study had been carried out to evaluate the radiation protection and quality control measures in 15 radiology department in Khartoum state. Data had been collected divided in to two main parts, first part radiation protection tests, which include visual inspection test, room dimension, and scattered radiation. Secondly quality control tests which include output accuracy, linearity, reproducibility, collimator, filtration, beam alignment. The data were processed, analyzed and compared with standard tolerance of radiation protection and quality control test to determine whether these units comply with standards or not, and suggest any modification should be necessary to correct the observed defects. The result of this study showed that, the average of acceptable percentage in all the units was 70% and 74% in radiation protection test and quality control test respectively. This percentage generally acceptable for all units.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.subjectBiomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectConventional X-rayen_US
dc.subjectMedical Imagingen_US
dc.subjectRadiographyen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic Imaging Toolen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of conventional X-ray unit in medical imaging departmenten_US
dc.title.alternative‫تقويم أداء أجهزة الاشعة السينية بأقسام التصوير الطبي‬en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Masters Dissertations : Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evaluation of conventional X-.pdftitle166.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Abstract .pdfAbstract 399.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Research.pdf
  Restricted Access
Research1.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
APPENDICES.pdfAPPENDICES586.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.