Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/4412
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAL MUSAAD, SALIH ALI AHMED
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor-ASHRAF AHMED MOHAMMED
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-14T06:28:59Z
dc.date.available2014-04-14T06:28:59Z
dc.date.issued2007-10-01
dc.identifier.citationAL MUSAAD,SALIH ALI AHMED . Causes Of Rejected Films In Riyadh Central Hospital Kingdom of Saudi Arabia /SALIH ALI AHMED AL MUSAAD;ASHRAF AHMED MOHAMMED.-Khartoum : sudan university of science and technology,Medical Radiologic Science,2007.-88p. : ill . ;28cm.- M. Sc.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/4412
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study was undertaken to identify the causes of film rejection in five X-ray departments at Riyadh central hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. In this study, I reviewed the X-ray beam and image formation, radiographic quality and the common causes of film rejection in conventional radiography, these causes such as errors and artifacts. Rejected radiographs of conventional film-screen radiography were collected over one month period then counted and recorded. The rejected radiographs and images were analyzed and categorized into eight groups according to the causes of rejection. The overall percentage reject rate (8%) obtained in this study slightly high but it is in the acceptable range. In this study it was found that the exposure (30%) and positioning (14%) errors were the main reasons for rejection. The centering errors (12-7%) were the third cause of film rejection, the fourth reason for film rejection was the patient motion (11.8%.). Mechanical influence of equipment and processors was less than 10% and in most departments was negligible. The rest of causes (22-85%) of rejection were due to many other causes they were grouped together as other causes of film rejection. From this result, it was clearly seen that more than 50% of the rejected films was contributed in particular to techniques and skills employed equipment and processors influence was less than 10%. Rejected films may be reduced to the minimum by reducing their causes, by applying effective quality assurance programs, full students' supervision and adequate regular staff training.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipsudan university of science and technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publishersudan university of science and technologyen_US
dc.subjectCausesen_US
dc.subjectSaudi Arabia.en_US
dc.titleCauses Of Rejected Films In Riyadh Central Hospital Kingdom of Saudi Arabiaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Masters Dissertations : Medical Radiologic Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Research ..pdf
  Restricted Access
Research15.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
Causes Of Rejected ... .pdf Title46.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Abstract.pdfAbstract66.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.