Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/27414
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Abuobaida Musa-
dc.contributor.authorAbdalgader, Ahmed Mohammed-
dc.contributor.authorFadl Elseed, Akram Mojahed-
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor, - T. Amro Yousof-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T10:49:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-24T10:49:49Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationAhmed, Abuobaida Musa.Comparative study of Petrophysical Properties in Bentiu & Aradeiba Formations & Their implication to Reservoir Quality\Abuobaida Musa Ahmed....{etal};T. Amro Yousof.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science & Technology,College of Petroleum Engineering & Technology,2022.-48p.:ill.;28cm.-Bachelors Search.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/27414-
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study wire line logging data of exploration well Laloba AG-1 in Muglad basin were analyzed in order to discriminates between the petro-physical properties in Aradeiba & Bentiu formations and accordingly to identify the formation of better reservoir quality. The petro-physical properties used were: shale volume (Vsh), total & effective porosities (PhiT & PhiE) as well as water saturation (Sw). Aradeiba formation was found to be more enriched in shale as compared to Bentiu which is cleaner. The Vsh in Aradeiba range between (0.17) to (0.9) with average value of (0.65), while Bentiu has Vsh range between (0) to (1) with average value of (0.44). The net to gross ratio was found to be (0.63) to (0.74) in Aradeiba, while in Bentiu (0.67) to (0.46) net to gross range was observed. The average effective porosity in Aradeiba formation was (0.23), while in Bentiu it was found to be (0. 22). The average water saturation in Aradeiba was found to be (0.8), while for Bentiu it averages about (0.89). The pay reservoir thickness in Aradeiba at zone one (1.83) and zone two (4.42) and in Bentiu at zone three (13.11), zone four (5.05) and zone five (4.42). Accordingly, Bentiu formation was found to be of better reservoir quality and more prolific compared to Aradeiba.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSudan University of Science & Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science & Technologyen_US
dc.subjectPetrophysical Propertiesen_US
dc.subjectReservoir Qualityen_US
dc.titleComparative study of Petrophysical Properties in Bentiu & Aradeiba Formations & Their implication to Reservoir Qualityen_US
dc.title.alternativeدراسة للمقارنة الخصائص البتروفيزيائية في تكوين بانتو و عرديبة وتأثيرها علي جودة المكمنen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Bachelor of Petroleum Engineering & Technology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparative study of .........pdfResearch2.39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.