Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/25803
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Aghabash, Ahmed Jar-Elnabi Tahir | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, Ali Ahmed Mohamed | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmed, Alyasa Jad-Alsied Musa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dafalla, Mosab Yousef Ahmed | - |
dc.contributor.author | Elamin, Omer Mohammed Ahmed | - |
dc.contributor.author | Supervisor, - Ammar Magzoub Omer Bashir | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-10T12:19:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-10T12:19:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Aghabash, Ahmed Jar-Elnabi Tahir.REGASIFICATION SELECTION FOR LNG TERMINAL IN SUDAN\Ahmed Jar-Elnabi Tahir Aghabash...{etal};Ammar Magzoub Omer Bashir.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science & Technology,College of Petroleum Engineering & Technology,2020.-45p.:ill.;28cm.-Bachelors Search. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/25803 | - |
dc.description | Bachelors Search | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The main objective of this research is to select the appropriate regasificationِ technology for Sudan liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal at Port Sudan, with a low Operating cost to suit the site climate conditions. Computer simulation software was used to design and simulate this technology to realize the optimum conditions which can regasify 3 MMTPA of LNG where this quantity per year is the energy demand of Sudan. Aspen HYSYS 11 was used for the simulation to design and determine the vaporizer specifications and to determine the capital costِ and operation cost. Standard selection criteria were used to select the most suitable regasification technology. In this regard using seawater was found to be the best for both selected options: Direct LNG vaporization using seawater or Indirect LNG vaporization using propane as intermediate between LNG and seawater. The comparison between the two options was implemented by regasification cost. The best option with a regasification cost 0.146 €/MMBTU was found to be the open rack vaporizer (ORV). | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Sudan University of Science & Technology | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sudan University of Science & Technology | en_US |
dc.subject | LNG TERMINAL | en_US |
dc.title | REGASIFICATION SELECTION FOR LNG TERMINAL IN SUDAN | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Bachelor of Petroleum Engineering & Technology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Regasification_Selection.......pdf | Research | 1.71 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.