Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/1853
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAli, Rania Eltahir Hiwali
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor -Mohammed Ahmed Ali Omer
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor -Mohammed Ahmed Ali Omer
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-02T10:29:06Z
dc.date.available2013-10-02T10:29:06Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.identifier.citationAli, Rania Eltahir Hiwali.Assessment of Immobilization Devices Accuracy for Head and Neck Tumors Radiotherapy/ Rania Eltahir Hiwali Ali; Mohammed Ahmed Ali Omer .- Khartoum : sudan university of scince and technology,Medical Radiologic Science,2011.- 44p. : ill ;28cm.- M.Sc.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/1853
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare between the accuracy of two immobilization devices as the Head fix and the thermoplastic cast for cancer patient's radiotherapy based on the field shift. The study carried out among 50 cancer patients received external radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. 25 patients were irradiated under Head fix device and the other 25 patients were irradiated under cast. Electronic portal images obtained during their first fractions of treatment and with viewing of superimposition of the obtained images the shift in mm was determine in the antero-posterior (AP) and cranio-caudal (CC) directions with respect to the simulator verification images for lateral fields were determined using off-line review of electronic portal imaging system. The analysis showed that in casting AP direction, a 52% of the patients encountered an anteroposterior field shift of 2 mm, 24% of patients having a field shift as 3 mm, 12% of the patients having a field shift as 1 mm and 12% of the patients were precisely reproduced in position i.e. not any noticed shift. While in casting CC direction there were 4% of the sample were encountered a 4 mm shift in CC direction, 20% were having 3 mm shift and 52% were having 2 mm shift in CC direction. However in fixed head and neck tumors irradiation in AP direction, the data showed that there were 12% of the patients encountered a 4 mm shift in AP direction, 44% of the patients were encountered with 3 mm shift in AP direction which is marginal; and the rest of sample were within the limit of permissible shift. While in fixed head CC direction, the data showed that 12% of the samples were having a field shift of 4 mm, 40% of the samples were having a field shift of 3 mm (marginal) while the rest of the samples were within the limit. The statistical analysis also revealed that in case of Casting-AP and Fixing-AP, the average shift in the radiation field was 1.88 ± 0.93 and 2.6 ± 0.82 mm respectively, While in case of Casting-CC and Fixing-CC direction, the data showed that the average shift in the field of radiation was 1.92 ± 1 and 2.5 ± 0.96 respectively, which indicating that the casting immobilization device is better than the head fix immobilization device.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipsudan university of science and technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publishersudan university of scince and technologyen_US
dc.subjecttumorsen_US
dc.titleAssessment of Immobilization Devices Accuracy for Head and Neck Tumors Radiotherapyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Masters Dissertations : Medical Radiologic Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Assessment of Immobilization ....pdf title 47.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Abstract.pdfAbstract.111.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Reserach.pdf
  Restricted Access
Reserach2.87 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.