SUST Repository

Isolation of Bacterial Contaminants from Operating Theatres in Khartoum

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ali, Sara Ali Mohammed
dc.contributor.author Supervisor,- Abdelbagi Elnagi Mohammed
dc.date.accessioned 2013-11-17T07:25:06Z
dc.date.available 2013-11-17T07:25:06Z
dc.date.issued 2010-07-01
dc.identifier.citation Ali,Sara Ali Mohammed.Isolation of Bacterial Contaminants from Operating Theatres in Khartoum/Sara Ali Mohammed Ali;Abdelbagi Elnagi Mohammed.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science and Technology,college of Medical Laboratory Science,2010.-47p. : ill. ; 28cm.-M.Sc. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/2316
dc.description Thesis en_US
dc.description.abstract The main aim of this study was to isolate and identify the most common bacterial contaminants in operating theatres in Khartoum State Hospitals during the period from January to April 2010. Briefly, one hundred samples (n=100) were collected from different sites of the operating theatres. The samples were collected from the major complex theatres at Khartoum North Teaching Hospital (KNTH) and Khartoum Teaching Hospital (KTH). By employing standard morphological and biochemical techniques, both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were isolated and identified. The common bacterial contaminants isolated from operation theatres were Staphylococcus aureus (30.8 %) , Staphylococcus epidermidis (20.5%), Staphylococcus saprophyticus (5.1%), Escherichia coli (20.5%), Pseudomonsa aeruginosa (15.4%), Proteus mirabilis ( 5.1%) and Enterobacter cloacae( 2.6%). The highest contaminants were isolated from the beds (17.9%), followed by floors (15.4%), trollis (12.8%), shoes and air conditions (10.3%), suckers, focusing lamps and anaesthesia machines (7.7%), oxygen cylinders and air (5.1%). While all S. aureus isolated from KNTH (100%) were methicillin resistant, only (50%) were methicillin resistant in KTH. However, 50% of S. aureus isolated from KTH and KNTH were sensitive to erythromycin, gentamicin and co-amoxiclav. S. saprophyticus was resistant to ampicillin but sensitive to erythromycin, gentamicin and co-amoxiclav. Similarly, S. epidermidis was sensitive to gentamicin and co-amoxiclav; however E. cloacae was resistant to ampicillin, co-amoxiclav and sensitive to chloramphenicol. In KNTH P. mirabilis was sensitive to ampicillin, co-amoxiclav and resistant to chloramphenicol and gentamicin. In contrast, P. mirabilis isolated from KTH was resistant to ampicillin, co-amoxiclav and gentamicin, but sensitive to chloramphenicol. E. coli isolated from KTH was highly resistant to ampicillin and co-amoxiclav, and sensitive to gentamicin and chloramphenicol, while that isolated from KNTH, 83.3% were resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol and gentamicin, and 66.7% were sensitive to co-amoxiclav. While 100% of P. aeruginosa isolated from KNTH were resistant to chloramphenicol, 66.7% of them were resistant to ampicillin, gentamicin and co- amoxiclav. However, 100% of P. aeruginosa isolated from KTH were resistant to ampicillin and 66.7% of them were resistant to co-amoxiclav, but sensitive to gentamicin and chloramphenicol. In conclusion, isolation of different resistant bacterial isolates from different surgical sites in various hospitals is a living evidence that various serotypes of bacterial species are persistant contaminants of the operating theatres in Khartoum hospitals. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Sudan University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sudan University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.subject Bacteria en_US
dc.title Isolation of Bacterial Contaminants from Operating Theatres in Khartoum en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search SUST


Browse

My Account