dc.contributor.author |
Musa, Yahia Ali Hussein |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Supervisor,- Hassan Abdel Aziz Musa |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-05-12T10:27:26Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-05-12T10:27:26Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2004-08-01 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Musa,Yahia Ali Hussein.Aerobic Bacterial Contamination of Anesthetic Equipments/Yahia Ali Hussein Musa;Hassan Abdel Aziz Musa.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science and Technology,college of Medical Laboratory Science,2004.-75p. : ill. ; 28cm.-M.Sc. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/4926 |
|
dc.description |
Thesis |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
This study was conducted with specific objectives of isolation and
identification of bacteria associated with Anesthetic apparatus used
during operations or intubations in intensive care units.
Two hundred samples were collected from ten different sites of
Anesthetic apparatus, Twenty specimens were taken from each sites were
considered sterile and ready to use. The duration of samples collection
was between (March 2001 – October 2002). Twenty specimens were
taken from each site. The samples were collected from the major
emergency complex theatre at Ribat University Hospital and the major
theatre of Sahiroon Hospital in Khartoum state.
Bacteriological examinations were performed in the microbiology
laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Ribat University Hospital and
Central Vet. Research Lab. Center, Soba.
Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were isolated,
identified and differentiated using standard different biochemical
reactions.
The Gram-positive isolates were Staphylococcus spp., Micrococcus spp.
and Bacillus spp.The Gram negative isolate were only Pseudomonas.
The commonest bacteria that contaminate the Anesthetic
apparatus were Pseudomonas spp. (60.37%), Micrococcus spp. (20.75%)
and Bacillus spp. (18.38%).
The antibiotic Sensitivity tests were done for each isolated strain.
Pseudomonas spp. were (100%) sensitive to Amickacin, Pefloxacin and
Ciprofloxacin and ( 72.7% ) sensitive to Ofloxacin and (100%) resistant
to Ampicillin, Cefoperazone, Piperacillin, Ceftazidime Ceftizoxime,
Augmentin, and (72.7% ) resistant to Cefotaxime and Gentamicin .
Micrococcus spp. were (85.7%) sensitive to Ciprofloxacin and (71.4%)
sensitive to Gentamicin, Ofloxacin and Pefloxacin, intermediately
sensitive to Ceftriazone. They were found to be (85.7%) resistant to
Cephalexin, (71.4%) to Ampicillin, and Lincomycin and (57.1%)
resistant to Roxythromycin and Cefotaxime.
Bacillus spp.were (100%) sensitive to Gentamicin and Ciprofloxacin,
(85.7%) to Roxythromycin, (71.4%) to Ofloxacin and Pefloxacin and
intermediately sensitive to Cephalexin and Ceftriazone .They were on the
Other hand found to be (85.7%) resistant to Ampicillin and (57.1%) to
Cefotaxime and Lincomycin. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
Sudan University of Science and Technology |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Sudan University of Science and Technology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Contamination-Anesthetic Equipments |
en_US |
dc.subject |
bacteria-Anesthetic apparatus |
en_US |
dc.title |
Aerobic Bacterial Contamination of Anesthetic Equipments |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |