SUST Repository

Aerobic Bacterial Contamination of Anesthetic Equipments

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Musa, Yahia Ali Hussein
dc.contributor.author Supervisor,- Hassan Abdel Aziz Musa
dc.date.accessioned 2014-05-12T10:27:26Z
dc.date.available 2014-05-12T10:27:26Z
dc.date.issued 2004-08-01
dc.identifier.citation Musa,Yahia Ali Hussein.Aerobic Bacterial Contamination of Anesthetic Equipments/Yahia Ali Hussein Musa;Hassan Abdel Aziz Musa.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science and Technology,college of Medical Laboratory Science,2004.-75p. : ill. ; 28cm.-M.Sc. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/4926
dc.description Thesis en_US
dc.description.abstract This study was conducted with specific objectives of isolation and identification of bacteria associated with Anesthetic apparatus used during operations or intubations in intensive care units. Two hundred samples were collected from ten different sites of Anesthetic apparatus, Twenty specimens were taken from each sites were considered sterile and ready to use. The duration of samples collection was between (March 2001 – October 2002). Twenty specimens were taken from each site. The samples were collected from the major emergency complex theatre at Ribat University Hospital and the major theatre of Sahiroon Hospital in Khartoum state. Bacteriological examinations were performed in the microbiology laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Ribat University Hospital and Central Vet. Research Lab. Center, Soba. Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were isolated, identified and differentiated using standard different biochemical reactions. The Gram-positive isolates were Staphylococcus spp., Micrococcus spp. and Bacillus spp.The Gram negative isolate were only Pseudomonas. The commonest bacteria that contaminate the Anesthetic apparatus were Pseudomonas spp. (60.37%), Micrococcus spp. (20.75%) and Bacillus spp. (18.38%). The antibiotic Sensitivity tests were done for each isolated strain. Pseudomonas spp. were (100%) sensitive to Amickacin, Pefloxacin and Ciprofloxacin and ( 72.7% ) sensitive to Ofloxacin and (100%) resistant to Ampicillin, Cefoperazone, Piperacillin, Ceftazidime Ceftizoxime, Augmentin, and (72.7% ) resistant to Cefotaxime and Gentamicin . Micrococcus spp. were (85.7%) sensitive to Ciprofloxacin and (71.4%) sensitive to Gentamicin, Ofloxacin and Pefloxacin, intermediately sensitive to Ceftriazone. They were found to be (85.7%) resistant to Cephalexin, (71.4%) to Ampicillin, and Lincomycin and (57.1%) resistant to Roxythromycin and Cefotaxime. Bacillus spp.were (100%) sensitive to Gentamicin and Ciprofloxacin, (85.7%) to Roxythromycin, (71.4%) to Ofloxacin and Pefloxacin and intermediately sensitive to Cephalexin and Ceftriazone .They were on the Other hand found to be (85.7%) resistant to Ampicillin and (57.1%) to Cefotaxime and Lincomycin. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Sudan University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sudan University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.subject Contamination-Anesthetic Equipments en_US
dc.subject bacteria-Anesthetic apparatus en_US
dc.title Aerobic Bacterial Contamination of Anesthetic Equipments en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search SUST


Browse

My Account