Abstract:
The main objective of the study was to describe and
analyze the farming systems in Rashad Locality. The
specific objectives were to describe and analyze the
farming systems in the area, to study the socio-economic
characteristics of the farmers in the different farming
systems as well as conducting crop budget analysis for the
farming systems to come up with recommendations for
the development of these farming systems. The study also
15
covered the problems and constraints of agricultural
production in the study area.
Primary and secondary data were obtained from
different sources, books, reports and other published
articles in websites.
A multi-stage stratified random
technique was used to select a sample size of 160
households, which represents 8% of the total population.
Descriptive
statistics
e.g.
means,
frequencies,
cross
tabulations, percentages and t-tests were used to describe
and
analyze
the
socio-economic
characteristics
of
households in the study area, and conduct enterprise and
farm budget models for the farming systems in the study
area.
The results of the study indicated that, average
household size is 9 members for traditional system and 10
members
mechanized
for
the
farming
semi-mechanized.
system,
40%
or
For
4
rainfed
household
members were in age group less than 15 years, 20% in
age group 16-25 years, 30% in age group 26-45 years.
Then the last two age groups 46-55 years and 56 years
and above are represented by 10% and zero of household
members, respectively.
Those engaged in farm labour
represent 30% of total household size, out of this
percentage, females represent 33%.
For the rainfed
traditional farming system, 55% of household members
are in age group less than 15 years old, 23% in both age
group 16-25 years old, and age group 26-45 years old.
16
Fifty six percent of total household members are engaged
in farming activities with females representing 40%.
The study indicated that, average harvested area
under the rainfed traditional farming system accounted for
18
feddans
bringing
crop
intensity
index
to
33%.
Household cultivated area decreases to 66% at harvest
time, while it is 90% of the cultivated area under the
rainfed
semi-mechanized
farming
system,
cropping
intensity accounted for 68%.
The cropping pattern in the study area is dominated
by four main crops, these are; sorghum, millet, sesame
and groundnuts. Minor crops that could be consumed in
the home or sold in the market are; cowpea, karkadeh,
maize, okra and pumpkin. All sample households are
cultivating sorghum and virtually 57% and 67% of the
cultivated land was under sorghum for the rainfed
traditional
and
semi-mechanized
farming
systems,
respectively.
Off-farm income from categories listed under others
(Gum Arabic tapping and petty trading) and income from
semi-skilled labour are the major sources of income for the
rainfed traditional farming system accounting for 31.9%
and 28.9%, respectively. For the rainfed semi-mechanized
farming system, income from skilled labour scored the
highest percentage of 75.6% followed by cash sent from
household members.
The results indicated that, all households for the
rainfed traditional and semi-mechanized farming system
17
are involved in livestock raising.
For the traditional
system, 33%, 65%, 14% are reported owning cattle, goats
and sheep, respectively. Camels and donkeys are kept as
animals
for
burden
and
transportation;
the
well-off
households tend to have camels 6%, while the majority is
using donkeys 42%.
Forty percent of households within
the rainfed semi-mechanized farming system own cattle,
13% goats, 27% sheep and only 13% owning donkeys.
The comparison between the two main systems as
reflected by gross margin and net income proved that,
rainfed traditional farming system is far better than the
rainfed semi-mechanized farming system e.g. gross output
per feddan for the traditional system is almost three times
that of the semi-mechanized system, while gross margin
per feddan and net income are also nine times those
calculated for the semi-mechanized farming system.
The study provided some recommendations, but the
most important is that; focus should be on vertical
production
expansion
through
provision
of
improved
agricultural inputs. Agricultural extension and agricultural
research should play a key role to provide responsive
farmers
with
quality
information
to
increase
their
production.