Abstract:
This study was designed to evaluate the different components
of the UNDP-supported Urban Upgrading and Poverty
Alleviation Project of Alhaj Yousif area in Khartoum State,
Sudan.
Perceived benefit from the Urban Upgrading and Poverty
Alleviation Project by the beneficiaries was the dependant
variable, and the independent variables in the analysis
included age, sex , marital status, level of educational, family
size, main occupation, participation in project planning, forms
of finance, marketing channel, participation in training
programs, production level, and income before participation
in the project.
A sample of (50) persons (25 males and 25 females)
represented the project's beneficiaries in Al Haj Yousif area -
members of
Al Rahma Voluntary Society.
The primary data were collected by means of individual
interviews involving use of a structured schedule. The
secondary data were collected from the Head Office of Urban
v
Upgrading and Poverty Alleviation Project and from other
project sources.
Data analysis involved use of descriptive statistical methods,
including t-tests for determining the statistical significant of
observed differences.
The study results showed the presence of significant
differences between the male and female beneficiaries in
terms of age, educational level, participation in project
planning and income before beneficiary’s participation in
project activities. No significant differences were found
between males and females in family size, attitude towards
loans repayment period, savings amount, access to project
training services and benefit from the training received from
the project.
The results indicated that the impact of the Urban Upgrading
and Poverty Alleviation Project among the beneficiaries was
affected by limitations in access to finance services.
On the light of the study findings, it is recommended that
poverty alleviation projects, like the UNDP-supported Urban
Upgrading and Poverty Alleviation Project should cater for:
vi
1. Assisting governmental capacity building through
provision of more targeted assistance to improve
national policy making and institutional reform.
2. Assisting national poverty programs by provision of
adequate funding and financial services to the
beneficiaries.
3. Use of a bottom-up approach and strengthening the role
of community-based organizations in the management
of poverty eradication projects.
The main results are:
1. The mean scores on age group for males and females
reflected no significant differences. Both males and
females benefiting from UPAP were mostly in the 35-
40 years age group.
2. Most of respondents had primary education, but the
education of males was relatively significantly higher.
3. Income before participation in UPAP for the larger
segment of the respondents (46%) was under 100,000
SDG per month.
vii
4. The majority of respondents (98%) practiced saving of
money for increasing their capital resources.
5. All of respondents had collaterals provided as
guarantees to get financed by UPAP. This reflects
elimination of the poorest from project's poverty
alleviation activities.
6. The types of income generating activities which were
financed by the project were: Production projects,
service projects and commercial projects.
7. UPAP training resulted into increased productivity
among 82% of the beneficiaries, and 70 percent of the
training recipients reported improvement in their
marketing abilities.
8. Income after participation in UPAP for most of the
respondents (78%) had increased substantially.
viii