Abstract:
This descriptive case study was conducted in National Public Health
Laboratory during period from July to December 2015; the study was aimed
to assess the quality management system in facilities and safety in the
laboratory. Questioner was checked by senior technologists of 12
departments, data was analyzed using SPSS computer program, frequencies
and percentages were calculated.
The present study reveals this result: the design easy to clean was found in
10/12(83.3%), the bench top water proof and resist to acid, alkali and
organic solvents 10/12(83.3%). The adequate illumination provided,
4/12(33.3%), the adequate storage space 7/12(58.3%), the sink available for
hand washing 10/12(83.3%), the corridor is free and unobstructed
8/12(66.7%), the flammable store in flammable storage cabinet 1/12 (8.3),
the use of mouth pipette was prohibited in 5/12(41.7%), the centrifuge
with cup 10/12(83.3%), the glass container stored on the floor 2/12
(16.7%), the valid fighting fire equipments 9/12(91.7%), the availability of
first aid kits in laboratories 7/12(58.3%), 2/12(16.7%) from the staff was
trained for firefighting , the biological safety cabinet certified last year 2/12
(16.7%), the biosafety cabinet surface disinfected by appropriate
disinfectant at the begin and end of each procedures 4/12(33.3%), the open
flame used inside cabinet 1/12 (8.3%), the access limited and restricted to
authorized personnel 9/12(75.0%), the availability personnel protective
equipments (PPE) 10/12(83.3), the non wearing of (PPE) outside laboratory
5/12(41.7), the eating ,drinking ,smoking and using cosmetics inside
laboratory 1/12 (8.3%), the registration of incident 3/12(25.0%), the
laboratory personnel immunized against occupational infectious diseases
v
4/12(33.3%), the safety manual 2/12 (16.7%), the bio hazard signs posted
on laboratory door 5/12(41.7%), the safety signs in the laboratory
5/12(41.7%). All cylinder secure 10/12(83.3), the chemical property
segregated in laboratory 7/12(58.3) , the hazardous chemical above eye
level 3/12(25.0%), the chemical store on the floor 4/12(33.3%), the
chemical container left open 1/12(8.3%), the proper label of solutions in
10/12(83.3%), availability of chemical waste container in 3/12(25.0%), the
availability of chemical waste container 3/12(25.0%), the liquid chemicals
equipment generated waste couplet with waste collected container 2/12
(16.7%), the chemical waste labeled appropriately 3/12(25.0%), the
chemical waste hazard identified on hazards waste labeled 1/12 (8.3%) the
chemical waste tightly capped 4/12(33.3%), method for minimization of
chemical waste 1/12 (8.3%) , procedure for collection of solvents 1/12
(8.3%), chemical waste container less than 55gallons in working area 2/12
(16.7%), types of waste in the laboratory 6/12(50.0%), the waste bag
coded by color 5/12(41.7%), the availability of sharps box container
4/12(33.3%).The study observed some safety variables were completely not
available such as the availability of eye wash in laboratory, waste
management guidelines, waste collection program , radioactive waste
container, the availability of hazards chemical waste management guidebook
and special procedure for disposable for acids and bases.
The study concluded that some variables were well establish such as the
design easy to cleaning and the bench top water proof resist to acid ,alkali
and organic solvents. Some variables were not well establish such as
adequate illumination, the flammable store in flammable storage cabinet and
the availability of first aid kits. Some variables are not available such as
vi
eye wash machine, waste management guidelines, waste collection program,
radioactive waste container and hazards chemical waste management.