SUST Repository

Evaluation of Approximate Analysis Methods for the Design of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Framed Tube Buildings

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ahmmed, Khadiga Sulieman Abakar
dc.contributor.author Supervisor - Nuha Moawia Akasha
dc.date.accessioned 2015-11-08T12:30:31Z
dc.date.available 2015-11-08T12:30:31Z
dc.date.issued 2015-05-10
dc.identifier.citation Ahmmed,Khadiga Sulieman Abakar . Evaluation of Approximate Analysis Methods for the Design of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Framed Tube Buildings /Khadiga Sulieman Abakar Ahmmed ;Nuha Moawia Akasha.-khartoum :Sudan University of Science and Technology,College of Engineering, 2015 .-128p. :ill. ;28cm .-M.Sc. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/11787
dc.description Thesis en_US
dc.description.abstract This research describes, manual calculation methods to analyze and design 2-dimensional reinforced concrete frames as part of forty story framed tube building. The building is composed of reinforced concrete walls, slabs, beams, and columns. It was analyzed under various load cases, the loads such as gravity loads, (dead and live loads) and lateral loads, (wind loads) were calculated. Linear elastic analysis was carried out using moment distribution and cantilever methods as manual approximate methods, and an analysis was done using computer program (ETABSv9.5.0). Moreover, the results of the 2-dimensional frame analysis program and manual calculations are included in the comparative study. The models are prepared as bare frame and shear wall. Some design requirements such as common assumptions for the structural analysis of tall buildings and sway limitations are discussed. The behavior of some structural systems for tall buildings subjected to horizontal forces is then considered, and one frame and shear wall were designed. The design strength was also checked for all members and it was determined that the members were adequate. Comparison included wind loads per story level and analysis results of bare frame such as shear forces, bending moments and axial forces were also considered. These results are displayed on tables. Based on comparison results, manual approximate methods are more conservative methods comparing with ) ETABS( program. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Sudan University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sudan University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.subject Civil Engineering en_US
dc.subject Structural Engineering en_US
dc.title Evaluation of Approximate Analysis Methods for the Design of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Framed Tube Buildings en_US
dc.title.alternative تقويم طرق التحليل التقريبية لتصميم المباني الخرسانية العالية ذات الهياكل الأنبوبية en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search SUST


Browse

My Account