Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/27852
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Ahmed Mohammed Osman-
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor, -Fath Elrahmann Ismael Khalifa-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-27T09:16:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-27T09:16:20Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-23-
dc.identifier.citationAhmed, Ahmed Mohammed Osman . Performance Evaluation of Buffer Management Techniques in Delay Tolerant Network \ Ahmed Mohammed Osman Ahmed ; Fath Elrahmann Ismael Khalifa .- Khartoum:Sudan University of Science & Technology,College of Engineering,2018.-84p.:ill.;28cm.-M.Sc.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/27852-
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstractTrying to enhance the network quality of service which becomes an important issue in networks world. Buffer management techniques one of the way to increase the performance of the network precisely in the Delay Tolerant Network ( DTN ). The main focus was on SHLI and LEPR Techniques to get the maximum potential of the network resources. The challenge is how to differentiate between the packets which delivered to nodes to define which packets have higher priority than others. Then a Differentiated Service Model (DiffServ) mechanism is proposed to solve this obstacle. This work will be done through simulation using MATLAB. A mathematical model was used to evaluate the performance of the network in term of QoS parameters such as ( Delay time, Bandwidth Utilization, Throughput and Data rate ). After implementing and run both algorithm over three type of services ( File transmission, Video and Voice) , results showed that percentage difference of delay time when apply both algorithm SHLI and LEPR for all services is 20%. For Throughput SHLI have higher value than LEPR about 18%.Regarding to Bandwidth Utilization, SHLI is most usage of resource than LEPR compared to LPER due to the increased packet size clustering. Then, data rate for SHLI is greater than the LPER by 23%. Also showed which techniques are better to implement for specific type of service or application to get high utilization of the resource which leading to high performance.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSudan University of Science & Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science & Technologyen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectElectronic Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectComputer and Networken_US
dc.subjectBuffer Management Techniquesen_US
dc.subjectDelay Tolerant Networken_US
dc.titlePerformance Evaluation of Buffer Management Techniques in Delay Tolerant Networken_US
dc.title.alternativeتقييم أداء تقنيات إدارة الذاكرة المؤقتة في شبكات ذات تحمل التأخيرen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Masters Dissertations : Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Performance Evaluation ....pdfResearch1.8 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.