Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/27703
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbdulrahem, Marwa Mohamed Sidahmed-
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor, -Amna Algarrai-
dc.contributor.authorCo-Supervisor, -Sohad Elwakeel-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T09:27:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-20T09:27:05Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-26-
dc.identifier.citationAbdulrahem, Marwa Mohamed Sidahmed .Comparison of Diode Laser and Scalpel Technique in Frenectomy Procedure \ Marwa Mohamed Sidahmed abdulrahem ; Amna Algarrai .-Khartoum : sudan university of science and technology , Institute Of Laser , 2022.- 42 P. : ill. ; 28cm .- Higher Diplomaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/27703-
dc.descriptionHigher Diplomaen_US
dc.description.abstractThe Frenum is a fold of mucous membrane that attaches the lips and cheeks to the alveolar mucosa and/or gingiva and underlying periosteum Labial frenum with an abnormal attachment can be termed an aberrant frenum which may interfere with many oral functions such as pronunciation and tongue movement. Interference may also occur with various therapeutic modalities in many dental departments such as in prosthodontics, orthodontics, and periodontal health, resulting in biofilm accumulation and may cause recession and contribute to diastema formation. Objective: The aim of this study was to record and then compare the intra-operative and postoperative objective and subjective effects of Diode laser and conventional techniques after frenectomy surgery. Methods: In this study, two patients were included where one received frenectomy procedure using Diode laser with wavelength of 980 nm, power of 2 watts and the other patient received scalpel frnectomy. Results: The patient treated with Diode laser experienced no intra-operative pain, less local anesthetic was used, the surgical field was bloodless and no sutures were needed. As for the patient treated via conventional scalpel technique, more local anesthetic was used, no intra-operative pain was experienced but mild pain was experienced post-operatively and more analgesics were used. Bleeding during the procedure was moderate and sutures were placed after completion of the procedure. Conclusion: Diode laser showed superiority to scalpel technique due to reduced amount of anesthetic and analgesic used, the bloodless surgical field and no intraoperative pain.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science & Technologyen_US
dc.subjectLaseren_US
dc.subjectLaser Applicationen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectDiode Laseren_US
dc.subjectScalpel Techniqueen_US
dc.titleComparison of Diode Laser and Scalpel Technique in Frenectomy Procedureen_US
dc.title.alternativeمقارنه بين الليزر الثنائي و تقنيه المشرط في استئصال اللجام الشفويen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Higher Diploma:Institute Laser

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison of Diode ..... .pdfResearch1.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.