Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/2683
Title: COMPARITIVE STUDY BETWEEN LOW LEVEL LASER THERABY AND CHLORHEXIDINE ON TREATMENT OF GINGIVITIES
Authors: Saqer, Buthaina Amin
Supervisor, - Nadia Ahmed Yahia Co - Supervisor, - Mahdi A.Suker
Keywords: laser therapy
chlorhexidine gel
gingivitis
laser energy
Laser types
Issue Date: 5-Jan-2006
Publisher: sudan university of scince and technology
Citation: Saqer , Buthaina Amin . COMPARITIVE STUDY BETWEEN LOW LEVEL LASER THERABY AND CHLORHEXIDINE ON TREATMENT OF GINGIVITIES / Buthaina Amin Saqer ; Nadia Ahmed Yahia , Mahdi Suker .- Khartoum : sudan university of scince and technology , Institute Of Laser , 2006 .- 40 P.: ill ; 28 cm .- M.Sc.
Abstract: The high level laser therapy (HLLT) treatment in dentistry have been assured as a very successful method, but the low level laser therapy (LLLT) is still limited and under researches. In this study a compare was done between the low level laser therapy and chlorhexidine gel on treatment of gingivitis. Forty eight patients were selected to be the cases of this study. In the left side chlorhexidine gel was applied after scaling and polishing, and this group is called group A. In the right side low level laser therapy was applied in different doses after scaling and polishing, and this group is called group B. In group B1 5Hz, 0.15 mJ/cm2 per 5 minute of low level laser therapy was applied to thirty one patients. In group B2 50Hz, 1.5mJ/cm2 per 5 minute of low level laser therapy was applied to twelve patients. In group B3 1000Hz, 30mJ/cm2 per 5 minute of low level laser therapy was applied to five patients. using 5Hz accelerate the treatment of gingivitis faster than using chlohexidine gel. While using 50Hz is as effective as chlorhexidine on treatment of gingivitis. But using 1000Hz is a harmful application.
Description: Thesis
URI: http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/2683
Appears in Collections:Masters Dissertations : Laser

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
COMPARITIVE STUDY BETWEEN ... .pdfTitle72.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Abstract.pdfAbstract159.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Chapter one l.pdf
  Restricted Access
Chapter102.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
Chapter two.pdf
  Restricted Access
Chapter149.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
Chapter three.pdf
  Restricted Access
Chapter133.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
Light..pdf
  Restricted Access
Light.150.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
References..pdfReferences96.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.