Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/21138
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRahama, Haitham Abdalla Osman-
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor, - Mohamed Elhafiz Mustafa Musa-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-17T07:48:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-17T07:48:30Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationRahama, Haitham Abdalla Osman.A comparative study between two workflow Tools management systems Case Study (Joget, Bonita)\Haitham Abdalla Osman Rahama;Mohamed Elhafiz Mustafa Musa.-Khartoum:Sudan University of Science & Technology,College of Computer Science and Information Technology,2018.-62p.:ill.;28cm.-M.Sc.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/21138-
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstractIt is difficult to choose the performance of a workflow management system because of the multitude of tools. This research provides a framework for comparing two tools of workflow systems (Joget, Bonita) in order to find the best one, The goal is to design framework that helps developers to the appropriate tool for a given task.The descriptive analytical approach (data collection and analysis) was followed and the proposed framework for comparing popular workflow tools, Joget and Bonita. It is found that Bonita is better in terms of multiple users and users Management. While Joget provides only three users, Bonita provides forms generation and database management. Joget generates forms one by one.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science & Technologyen_US
dc.subjectworkflow Toolsen_US
dc.subjectmanagement systemsen_US
dc.titleA comparative study between two workflow Tools management systems Case Study (Joget, Bonita)en_US
dc.title.alternativeدراسة مقارنة بين اداتين لإدارة أدوات سيرالعملen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Masters Dissertations : Computer Science and Information Technology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A comparative study between......pdfResearch2.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.