Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/20254
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDoka, Talib Selim-
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, El Sayed El Bashir-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T11:05:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-01T11:05:05Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-05-
dc.identifier.citationDoka, Talib Selim . Evaluation of Improved Gugu( local storage container ) In Reducing Post –Harvest insect losses of sorghum for small farmer \ Talib Selim Doka , El Sayed El Bashir Mohamed .- Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences.- vol18, no2.-2017.- articheen_US
dc.identifier.issn1858 6775-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/20254-
dc.descriptionArticelen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted in the period of (March, 2007- February, 2008), to evaluate the suitability of four types of storage units, (Improved gugu, local gugu, Guttia and brick store) made of local materials, which used by small farmers with regard to protecting stored sorghum cultivars (Gadam Alhamam and Fetterita) from insect damages during storage period of one year . The percentage weight loss of stored seeds was used as the parameter for determination of the efficiency of the storage units. Considerable losses were recorded at Renk, Upper Nile State, South Sudan and surrounding areas (Guwzrum, Gelhak, Geigar and Wadacona). The results show that, improved gugues (Sweiba) were better storage structure than the local gugues, guttias and small brick stores, because there were less insect infestation, decreased weight losses of grains and better seed quality in improved structures. The weight losses were increased gradually, no weight losses were recorded in the first months and the highest losses were recorded in the last months of the year. The mean cumulative percentage weight loss due to insect infestation during (February)in Gadam Alhamam were approximately 5.30%, in an improved gugu,17.27%, in a local gugu,17.81% in Guttia, (Hut) and 21.01%, in brick stores.While in Fetterita; they were 12.41%, 30.84%, 28.65%, and 25.37%, in improved gugu, local gugu, Guttia and brick stores respectively.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.subjectPost harvest lossesen_US
dc.subjectstored insect pestsen_US
dc.subjectimproved guguen_US
dc.subjectSorghum storageen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Improved Gugu( local storage container ) In Reducing Post –Harvest insect losses of sorghum for small farmeren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Volume 18 No. 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evaluation of Improved ... .pdfArticle643.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.