Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/14803
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAli, Mohammed Zumrawi-
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor, -Mahmoud Ali Ahmed-
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-04T06:20:50Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-04T06:20:50Z-
dc.date.issued2016-11-10-
dc.identifier.citationAli, Mohammed Zumrawi . Incidental VS. Intentional Vocabulary Amongst Sudanese Undergraduates/ Mohammed Zumrawi Ali ; Mahmoud Ali Ahmed .- Khartoum: Sudan University of Science and Technology, 2016 .- 132p. : ill. ;28cm .- M.Sc.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/14803-
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study is an attempt to explore some aspects of distinction between incidental and intentional vocabulary learning among second and fourth year undergraduate students of English . This I because approach distinction is reliable of raising learners' competence to activate the d cognitive process of constructive learning rather than merely depending on the traditions of instructive learning . For this purpose , vocabulary achievement is devised to explain the distinctive nature of the two learning approaches as indicated by the results obtained from vocabulary test. To achieve that goal , the combination of the experimental , descriptive and analytical approach to data is employed to see the extent to which the two learning approaches are distinct , but strongly related . A pre-test and a post-test with a mediating practical teaching experiment are used to prepare for and collect data on the nature of vocabulary achievement . Responses are elicited from two subject groups of variable levels of linguistic information , teaching techniques and learning strategies that is second year students receive no previous linguistic information. Scores are used to identify quantity and quality of vocabulary knowledge , learning measurement and the degree of reinforcement shared between the two approaches . The findings reflects limited vocabulary achievement of significant variation with regard to obvious approach distinction . The incidental learners with a majority of (68%) appear to know more about vocabulary use whereas the intentional learners with an average of (58%) are observed to know more about vocabulary linguistic facts . This comes as a result of the direct norm of assessment available for incidental learners which is not the case for incidental learning as dominated by indirect measuring . Therefore , the study recommends that incidental learning should be given the chance to work in coincidence with intentional one so that the two approaches are clearly distinguished in aspects of concepts , procedures , strategies , techniques and factors . Awareness of these issues is well beneficial in adopting intentional learning for the reinforcement of incidental learning to work as complementary rather than isolated approaches .en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.subjectLanguagesen_US
dc.subjectEnglish Languageen_US
dc.subjectIncidental VS. Intentional Vocabularyen_US
dc.subjectSudanese Undergraduatesen_US
dc.titleIncidental VS. Intentional Vocabulary Amongst Sudanese Undergraduates (The case of level two and four at the faculty of education in University of Kassalaen_US
dc.title.alternativeالمفردات العرضية مقابل المقصودة وسط الطلاب السودانيين تحت التخرج (حالة المستويين الثاني والرابع بكلية التربية جامعة كسلا)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:PhD theses : Languages

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Incidental VS. Intentional .....pdfTitle60.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Abstract.pdfAbstract110.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Research.pdfResearch1.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.