Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/12382
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSideeg, Fatima Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorAbdAlla, Latifa Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorHmad, Nmareq Abbas
dc.contributor.authorSupervisor - Mohamed Yousuf Khalil
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-28T10:57:44Z
dc.date.available2015-12-28T10:57:44Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-02
dc.identifier.citationSideeg,Fatima Ahmed.A Comparative Study of Characteristics Fish Burger and Beef Burger /Fatima Ahmed Sideeg ,Latifa Ibrahim AbdAlla,Nmareq Abbas Hmad ;Mohamed Yousuf Khalil .-khartoum :Sudan University of Science and Technology ,Collage of Animal Production,2015 .-23p. :ill. ;28cm .-Bachelors Searchen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/12382
dc.descriptionBachelors Searchen_US
dc.description.abstractThis experiment was conducted to compare some quality characteristics of fish and beef burger samples. After processing and preservation fish and beef sample were cooled at˗18˚c about 24hour. Were determined in doublicate for chemical analysis and sensory evaluation. Sample were showed significant (p≤0.05) differences in to croude protein and either extract.The results proved fish burger higher croude protein and either extract content and economic value that there low cost in fish burger. However there were no significant (p≤0.05) different in sensory evaluation. Keywords: sensory evaluation , chemical analysis, significant, fish burger.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSudan University of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.subjectanimal productionen_US
dc.subjectBurger Fishen_US
dc.subjectBurger cowen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Study of Characteristics Fish Burger and Beef Burgeren_US
dc.title.alternativeمقارنة بين خصائص بيرقر السمك وبيرقر البقرen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Bachelor of Animal Production

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A Comparative Study of ...pdfTitel179.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Abstract.pdfAbstract136.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Research.pdfResearch212.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.